Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Oklahoma

Quality Aircraft Accessories

Tulsa, OK · ~40 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Aircraft Accessories runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Quality Aircraft Accessories: 1.2 TCR = 38% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Aircraft Accessories safety composite

Quality Aircraft Accessories scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Quality Aircraft Accessories held a steady TCR band

Quality Aircraft Accessories's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/31
  • PHOTO Brazonics Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brazonics Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Quality Aircraft Accessories in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Aircraft Accessories averages 1.2 TCR (38% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Aircraft Accessories TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Quality Aircraft Accessories falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 31 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Oklahoma.

Quality Aircraft Accessories (40 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Aircraft Accessories
Quality Aircraft Accessories (40 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Quality Aircraft Accessories has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · OK · Tulsa

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brazonics Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Rotorcraft - PA 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Firstmark Aerospace Corporation 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ducommun - Berryville 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Engelbrecht Farms, LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE SandRidge Energy - Corporate Office 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE R&R Workover Rigs 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE OG&E-Northeast District Service Cen 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Heritage Cooperative: Canfield Grain, Energy, Office, & Store 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR United Rotorcraft - PA 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR California Hydronics Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Charter Next Generation - RP 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Portland East 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franklin County Court of Justice 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE RMRS - South Yard 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triangle Services - Minnesota Area Security Route Svcs 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.