Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living

Englewood, CO · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living: 2.1 TCR = 55% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living safety composite

Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living held a steady TCR band

Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=6.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Englewood, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/140
  • PHOTO Bartlett Reserve
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bartlett Reserve (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living averages 2.1 TCR (55% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living (22 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living
Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living (22 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Chateau Des Mons Care and Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.3 6.3 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Englewood

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 325 employers in Englewood, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bartlett Reserve 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vitality Living Elizabethtown 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bedford, The 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR South High Senior Living 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack's Bean Company LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ponderosa Partnership LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Demolition, Inc 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Isabel Electric Association- Pueblo West Administration 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR WAH - East and West 2,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Meridian 2,030 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swedish Medical Center 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR ULA-Denver 1,324 FTE
NAT-TCR 1301 S. Rockwell St Chicago IL 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 811 Route 33 Freehold NJ 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR JEM Technical 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Garland, Tx 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4T Total Lawn,Inc 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brattleboro VT 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berger Transfer & Storage, Inc- Dallas 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Santa Fe Springs, Ca Hexacomb 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.