Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating · Tennessee

Chattanooga Plant 2

Name: Chattanooga Plant 2 Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Chattanooga, TN · ~55 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.2
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chattanooga Plant 2 runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating workplace, earning a grade B.

Chattanooga Plant 2: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chattanooga Plant 2 safety composite

Chattanooga Plant 2 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers
DART rate: F 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chattanooga Plant 2: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 5.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.76× in 2019

Chattanooga Plant 2's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325211 · Chattanooga, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

DART 1.7 DART
RANK #9/14
PHOTO Auriga Polymers Inc.
BOOK 4y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Auriga Polymers Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.2
Auriga Polymer

2.2
Safas Corporat

2.2
Industrial Pla

2.2
Ennis - Polynt

2.2

What this shows Chattanooga Plant 2 averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating BLS benchmark).

Chattanooga Plant 2 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Chattanooga Plant 2 falls in its industry

644 Plastics and synthetic resins establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 Plastics and synthetic resins employers in Tennessee.

Chattanooga Plant 2 (55 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Chattanooga Plant 2 has fewer employees than the Plastics and synthetic resins regenerati median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2019	1.7	1.7	1
2018	1.6	0.0	1
2017	5.5	5.5	3
2016	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325211 · TN · Chattanooga

644 Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Auriga Polymers Inc.	SPARTANBURG, SC	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Safas Corporation	CLIFTON, NJ	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Industrial Plastics & Machine	BATON ROUGE, LA	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Ennis - Polynt	ENNIS, TX	2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Alabama GP Vaccination Department	LORETTO	55 FTE
STATE-SIZE	GP Production (Pikeville)	PIKEVILLE	55 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Water Department	COOKEVILLE	55 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Charleston Site	CHARLESTON	55 FTE
CITY-NEAR	CHATTANOOGA COKE	Chattanooga	8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR	CHATTANOOGA FOOD	Chattanooga	8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR	USXpress	Chattanooga	7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cardiology GB	Chattanooga	6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR	Mosaic Carrollton	Carrollton, TX	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	International Speedway Corporation	Daytona Beach, FL	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	OK-OK	Yukon, OK	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	MMG PSI (Pulmonary, Sleep, Intensivist)	Peoria, IL	2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	North Branch Construction, Inc. Home Office	Concord, NH	55 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Dynaco USA	Mundelein, IL	55 FTE
NAT-SIZE	The Jung Hotel & Residences	New Orleans, LA	55 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Cst Mke	Cudahy, WI	55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.