Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Louisiana

The Jung Hotel & Residences

New Orleans, LA · ~55 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Jung Hotel & Residences runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade C.

The Jung Hotel & Residences: 3.4 TCR = 114% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Jung Hotel & Residences safety composite

The Jung Hotel & Residences scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Jung Hotel & Residences held a steady TCR band

The Jung Hotel & Residences's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · New Orleans, LA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 114% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #69/147
  • PHOTO Embassy Suites Lake …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Embassy Suites Lake Buena Vista South (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

The Jung Hotel & Residences in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Jung Hotel & Residences averages 3.4 TCR (114% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Jung Hotel & Residences TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.0

Where The Jung Hotel & Residences falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 147 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Louisiana.

The Jung Hotel & Residences (55 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Jung Hotel & Residences
The Jung Hotel & Residences (55 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

The Jung Hotel & Residences has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 10.3 7.7 3 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · LA · New Orleans

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 450 employers in New Orleans, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Embassy Suites Lake Buena Vista South 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 41481 SIGNIA BY HILTON ORLANDO BONNET CREEK 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Embassy Suites - Chicago Naperville 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delta by Marriott Fargo 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE PetroTech Solutions, LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs Baton Rouge South Wastewater Treatment Plant (Main) & North Wastewater Treatment Plant OMI 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carencro, LA 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105206 - I-10 Capital Corridor 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCMC Health 8,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN 4,395 FTE
NAT-TCR MRF San Jose 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Toledo Recycling and Transfer Center 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Skills of Central Pa Inc Chestnut Ave 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 5 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE #180 Art Van Bolingbrook 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quest Automated Services, LLC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chattanooga Plant 2 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coast Cooling 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.