Residential construction, single-family, general contractors · Missouri

Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc.

Washington, MO · ~286 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc. runs at 322% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Residential construction, single-family, general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc.: 12.2 TCR = 322% of Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc. safety composite

Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2022→2024

Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc. injury rate improved

Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.6 from 11.4 in 2022 to 10.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=11.4 · 2023=14.5 · 2024=10.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Washington, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.2 · 322% of ind

  • DART 10.4 DART
  • RANK #11/13
  • PHOTO Presby Construction …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 90 inj
  • SIZE ~286 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Presby Construction Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc. averages 12.2 TCR (322% of the Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc. TCR series: 2022=11.4 · 2023=14.5 · 2024=10.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc. falls in its industry

976 Residential construction, sing establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 13 Residential construction, sing employers in Missouri.

Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc. (286 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc.
Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc. (286 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Cheltenham Construction Services, Inc. has more employees than the Residential construction, single-family, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.8 10.4 27 0 0
2023 14.5 9.8 37 0 0
2022 11.4 10.5 26 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · MO · Washington

976 Residential construction, single-family, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 62 employers in Washington, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Presby Construction Inc. 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cold Mountain Builders 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edwards Smith Construction 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Wadsworth Company 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CertainTeed, LLC 286 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lear Corporation - Wentzville 286 FTE
STATE-SIZE Excelsior Springs Seating Systems 286 FTE
STATE-SIZE DC18 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL WASHINGTON 1,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Instrumentation : Washington SPO215 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fluid Connectors : Washington SPO215 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 172 398 FTE
NAT-TCR Last Mile DSP LLC 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bevill Vineyard Management LLC 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR R&S Construction Services Inc. 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR PCC Community Markets - West Seattle 12.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Circuits Inc. 286 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roppe Corporation 286 FTE
NAT-SIZE All American Poly of New Jersey 286 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alsaker Corporation 286 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.