Nursing homes · Pennsylvania

Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab

Philadelphia, PA · ~199 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab: 8.2 TCR = 127% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab safety composite

Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.9

2016→2024

Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab injury rate improved

Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab's TCR fell 22.9 from 24.5 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 24.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=24.5 · 2017=16.7 · 2018=16.2 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.2 · 127% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #440/754
  • PHOTO Minnesota Department…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 133 inj
  • SIZE ~199 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab averages 8.2 TCR (127% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab TCR series: 2016=24.5 · 2017=16.7 · 2018=16.2 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #440 safest of 754 Nursing homes employers in Pennsylvania.

Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab (199 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab
Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab (199 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.8 0.0 4 0 0
2020 1.7 0.0 3 0 0
2019 9.6 1.0 20 0 0
2018 16.2 0.6 28 0 0
2017 16.7 12.9 29 2 0
2016 24.5 24.5 46 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Philadelphia

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warsaw Meadows Care center 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azalea Gardens Nursing Center 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nova Health and Rehab 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 103671 - Hill Top Energy Center 199 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shearer's Foods - WTR 199 FTE
STATE-SIZE Myerstown 199 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mersen USA St Marys 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR SpecialtyCare 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Reddy Ice - Phoenix (203) 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Alumni Roofing Lexington 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LWA 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Yorktown 199 FTE
NAT-SIZE Community Health Services 199 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pender 199 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #0208 199 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.