Nursing homes · Minnesota

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs

Minneapolis, MN · ~575 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs: 8.2 TCR = 127% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs safety composite

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.3

2018→2024

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs injury rate improved

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs's TCR fell 8.3 from 10.9 in 2018 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.9 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=11.5 · 2022=11.6 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.2 · 127% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #220/430
  • PHOTO Cheltenham Nursing a…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 208 inj
  • SIZE ~575 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs averages 8.2 TCR (127% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs TCR series: 2018=10.9 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=11.5 · 2022=11.6 · 2023=6 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #220 safest of 430 Nursing homes employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs (575 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs
Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs (575 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 1.9 14 0 0
2023 6.0 4.3 25 3 0
2022 11.6 10.5 36 17 0
2020 11.5 10.8 41 19 0
2019 6.8 5.5 35 1 0
2018 10.9 8.4 57 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · Minneapolis

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cheltenham Nursing and Rehab 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warsaw Meadows Care center 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azalea Gardens Nursing Center 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nova Health and Rehab 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE MMSP - Minneapolis Headquarters 575 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bosch Automotive Service Solutions 574 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hearth & Home Technologies 576 FTE
STATE-SIZE Independent School District #748 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Springbrook NY Inc - Bird Ave 775 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 3895 Sun Valley 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Resilite Sports Products, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Viking SupplyNet & Fabrication Services - Doraville 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE CareSense HC 575 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carl Buddig & Company-Montgomery 575 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stanley Black and Decker Sedalia Operations 575 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chalmette Refining, L.L.C. 575 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.