Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing · California

CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5)

Modesto, CA · ~76 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5) runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5): 4.9 TCR = 149% of Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5) safety composite

CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.8

2018→2024

CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5) injury rate improved

CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5)'s TCR fell 7.8 from 9.7 in 2018 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.7 · 2019=10.7 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Modesto, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 149% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #19/67
  • PHOTO FVWP
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FVWP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5) averages 4.9 TCR (149% of the Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5) TCR series: 2018=9.7 · 2019=10.7 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=2 · 2022=1 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5) falls in its industry

952 Pallet parts, wood, manufactur establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 67 Pallet parts, wood, manufactur employers in California.

CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5) (76 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5)
CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5) (76 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

CHEP Modesto Service Center (UTB5) has more employees than the Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2020 8.3 6.9 6 0 0
2019 10.7 6.4 5 0 0
2018 9.7 3.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · CA · Modesto

952 Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 418 employers in Modesto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FVWP 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Syracuse 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kamps Pallets South Charleston 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Upshur Forest Products,LLC 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ADMINISTRATION 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3181_6797 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&J Labor,Inc. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fujishige Farms, Inc. 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30240) 3,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modesto Operations 3,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-930 3,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR 930 DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF MODESTO 2,759 FTE
NAT-TCR War Memorial Hospital 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Marriott Seatac 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Intonu LLC 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR St. George Regional Hospital 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arkema West Chester Plant 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trusted Hand Service Inc, 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Live Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comet Industries 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.