Cable and Other Subscription Programming · California

CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St

San Francisco, CA · ~76 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
27.3
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St runs at 3906% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cable and Other Subscription Programming workplace, earning a grade F.

CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St: 27.3 TCR = 3906% of Cable and Other Subscription Programming BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St safety composite

CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 27.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−29.0

2022→2023

CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St injury rate improved

CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St's TCR fell 29.0 from 41.8 in 2022 to 12.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 41.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=41.8 · 2023=12.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 27.3 · 3906% of ind

  • DART 12.9 DART
  • RANK #39/42
  • PHOTO CA - Fremont, 395 Mo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CA - Fremont, 395 Mowry Ave (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St averages 27.3 TCR (3906% of the Cable and Other Subscription Programming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St TCR series: 2022=41.8 · 2023=12.9 · BLS 0.7

Where CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St falls in its industry

455 Cable and Other Subscription P establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 42 Cable and Other Subscription P employers in California.

CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St (76 employees, TCR 27.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St
CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St (76 employees, TCR 27.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

CA - San Francisco, 2055 Folsom St has fewer employees than the Cable and Other Subscription Programming median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.9 12.9 6 4 0
2022 41.8 40.1 10 14 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · CA · San Francisco

455 Cable and Other Subscription Programming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CA - Fremont, 395 Mowry Ave 27.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA - Burlingame, 860 Stanton Rd 26.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA - Scotts Valley, 106 Whispering Pines Dr 28.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA - Sacramento, 6200 Franklin Boulevard 26.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ADMINISTRATION 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3181_6797 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&J Labor,Inc. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fujishige Farms, Inc. 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Springbrook NY Inc - GEMS School 440 27.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Edgewood Spring Creek of Boise 27.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 27.4 TCR
NAT-TCR YOUNGSVILLE 27.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vail Place 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodland Heights 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mittera - Arlington 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wesleyan Market Place* 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.