Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Maryland

Cherry Hill Construction, Inc.

Jessup, MD · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Cherry Hill Construction, Inc.: 0.3 TCR = 11% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. safety composite

Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2020→2024

Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. injury rate improved

Cherry Hill Construction, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.5 from 1.5 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Jessup, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/39
  • PHOTO California Departmen…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: California Department of Transportation Facility 407 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. averages 0.3 TCR (11% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2020=1.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 39 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Maryland.

Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Cherry Hill Construction, Inc.
Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.5 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · MD · Jessup

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 122 employers in Jessup, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 407 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 418 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 105116 - IH 820 SE Connector 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 40 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE St. Charles Energy Center 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE CRB Builders, LLC - Rockville Office 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harbel Inc 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCS:LC061 - LC061-Elkridge MD 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster Foods 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jessup Correctional Institution 530 FTE
CITY-NEAR RNDC Jessup 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Baltimore, LLC 491 FTE
NAT-TCR Celanese LTD, Clear Lake 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Office 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Closures 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rich Coast Corporation 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chowchilla Water District 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oaks at Evans 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharon 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.