Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing · Ohio

L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics

Mason, OH · ~892 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics: 0.3 TCR = 9% of Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics safety composite

L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2021→2024

L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics injury rate improved

L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.5 in 2021 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.5 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Mason, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #3/14
  • PHOTO Telephonics 815 Farm…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~892 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Telephonics 815 Farmingdale (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics averages 0.3 TCR (9% of the Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics TCR series: 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 3.3

Where L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics falls in its industry

388 Search and detection systems a establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 14 Search and detection systems a employers in Ohio.

L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics (892 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics
L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics (892 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics has more employees than the Search and detection systems and instrum median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2023 0.5 0.1 4 0 0
2022 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2021 0.5 0.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · OH · Mason

388 Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 159 employers in Mason, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Telephonics 815 Farmingdale 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garmin AT 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 407 N. John Rodes Blvd 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich - Sensors and Integrated Systems- Burnsville MN 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Barnesville Hospital Association 893 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thirty-One Gifts Easton 894 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3638-F 890 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barberton Campus 888 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intelligrated Systems, LLC, dba Honeywell Intelligrated and its successors 1,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intelligrated Systems LLC - Installations 966 FTE
CITY-NEAR HQ & FIELD 915 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Cincinnati Electronics 811 FTE
NAT-TCR Central Office 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Celanese LTD, Clear Lake 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Egm, LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hanson Place Office-NYEJ 892 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Air Lines - TPA 892 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peace Hospital 892 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boyne Mountain Resort 892 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.