Tank lining contractors · North Carolina

Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc.

Statesville, NC · ~171 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tank lining contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc.: 0.9 TCR = 32% of Tank lining contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. safety composite

Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2023

Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.9 from 1.3 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.9 · 2023=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Statesville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #9/40
  • PHOTO SCEC - Vero Beach
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~171 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCEC - Vero Beach (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. averages 0.9 TCR (32% of the Tank lining contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1 · 2021=0.9 · 2023=0.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Tank lining contractors establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 40 Tank lining contractors employers in North Carolina.

Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. (171 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc.
Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. (171 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Tank lining contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 2 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 1 1 0
2018 1.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.3 0.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · NC · Statesville

1,634 Tank lining contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 181 employers in Statesville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCEC - Vero Beach 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ziegler Industries 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR North American Services Group - Hurricane 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crane Service 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Asphalt Paving 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corp et al 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kings Mountain 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brooks Brothers Group - Garland 171 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-0960 974 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doosan Bobcat 857 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0960 LOWE S NORTH CAROLINA RDC 836 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cheney Brothers Inc. - Statesville 830 FTE
NAT-TCR Electrical Engineering and Equipment Co (Pc4426) 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Mail Delivery Systems 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Delta Sheet Metal 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Treasurer/Tax Collector 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Recovery Centers of America 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE United States Gypsum Co, Bridgeport Plant 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meridian Ms Plant 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reno-Northtowne #017 171 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.