Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) · Maryland

Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp

Salisbury, MD · ~158 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp runs at 594% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) workplace, earning a grade F.

Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp: 19.6 TCR = 594% of Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp safety composite

Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp: 9.2 → 17.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 734.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2024

Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp's TCR rose 8.1 from 9.2 in 2017 to 17.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 734.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · Salisbury, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 19.6 · 594% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Washburn & Doughty A…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 319 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Washburn & Doughty Associates, Inc. (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp averages 19.6 TCR (594% of the Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp TCR series: 2017=9.2 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=17.7 · 2020=17 · 2021=17.3 · 2022=49.1 · 2023=734.4 · 2024=17.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp falls in its industry

454 Shipyard (i.e., facility capab establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Shipyard (i.e., facility capab employers in Maryland.

Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp (158 employees, TCR 19.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp
Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp (158 employees, TCR 19.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp has more employees than the Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of buil median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.2 7.6 77 0 0
2023 734.4 248.1 74 0 0
2022 49.1 15.9 71 0 0
2021 17.3 13.5 18 0 0
2020 17.0 6.0 16 1 0
2019 17.7 12.6 31 0 0
2018 9.7 5.7 17 0 0
2017 9.2 9.2 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · MD · Salisbury

454 Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 132 employers in Salisbury, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Washburn & Doughty Associates, Inc. 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR McCarty Flanigan, LLC 19.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Snow & Company, Inc. 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR IMIA, LLC Pascagoula 21.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chesapeake Optical Lab 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6921-00403 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472-NAI-0035-0035-01938 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE GIANT 2332 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 637 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salisbury Plant 584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-PD-SBY-SALISBURY-PD 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Salisbury 430 FTE
NAT-TCR Chuckawalla Valley State Prison 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-00707 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Arbors at Woodsfield 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mathew Hall Components 19.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pneumatic Scale Angelus 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foliot Furniture 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buhler Inc 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laurence-Hovenier, Inc. 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.