Continuing care retirement communities · Maryland

Bayleigh Chase

Name: Bayleigh Chase Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Easton, MD · ~158 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 9.2
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bayleigh Chase runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bayleigh Chase: 9.2 TCR = 242% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bayleigh Chase safety composite

Bayleigh Chase scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 9.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers
DART rate: C 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−65.3

2018→2022

Bayleigh Chase injury rate improved

Bayleigh Chase's TCR fell 65.3 from 69.1 in 2018 to 3.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 69.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=69.1 · 2019=16.0 · 2020=7.8 · 2022=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Easton, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 242% of ind

DART 2.7 DART
RANK #64/87
PHOTO Fox Run Village
BOOK 5y book
INJ 40 inj
SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fox Run Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

This site

9.2
Fox Run Villag

9.2
Sweet Galilee

9.2
Arden Courts o

9.2
Chapel Ridge

9.2

What this shows Bayleigh Chase averages 9.2 TCR (242% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Bayleigh Chase TCR series: 2018=69.1 · 2019=16 · 2020=7.8 · 2022=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Bayleigh Chase falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 87 Continuing care retirement com employers in Maryland.

Bayleigh Chase (158 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Bayleigh Chase has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2022	3.7	2.7	5	2
2021	-	-	0	0
2020	7.8	2.2	5	9
2019	16.0	7.7	27	0
2018	69.1	46.0	3	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MD · Easton

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 72 employers in Easton, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Fox Run Village	NOVI, MI	9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Sweet Galilee at the Wigwam	ANDERSON, IN	9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Arden Courts of Wayne	WAYNE, NJ	9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Chapel Ridge	BRADFORD, PA	9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corp	SALISBURY	158 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Chesapeake Optical Lab	BALTIMORE	158 FTE
STATE-SIZE	6921-00403	OLNEY	158 FTE
STATE-SIZE	5472-NAI-0035-0035-01938	LA PLATA	158 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University of Maryland Shore Medical Center at Easton	Easton	1,182 FTE
CITY-NEAR	ACTS Retirement Life Communities - Bayleigh Chase	Easton	285 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Aphena Pharma Solutions - Industrial Park Road	Easton	255 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Shore Bancshares Inc	Easton	212 FTE
NAT-TCR	4054-ABS-0030-0030-00156	Boise, ID	9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	6962-ABS-0029-0028-02543	Alhambra, CA	9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	6400-SWY-0020-0020-02963	Frisco, TX	9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	5472-NAI-0033-0033-03528	Bristol, VT	9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Cokesbury Village	Hockessin, FL	158 FTE
NAT-SIZE	tkSCS Livermore Atlantis	Livermore, CA	158 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Big Y Foods, Inc. Tolland	Tolland, CT	158 FTE
NAT-SIZE	LSL Healthcare Inc	Niles, IL	158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.