Die sets for metal stamping presses manufacturing · Michigan

Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO)

Chesterfield, MI · ~101 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO) runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Die sets for metal stamping presses manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO): 2.9 TCR = 88% of Die sets for metal stamping presses manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO) safety composite

Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO): 0.8 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.72× in 2024

Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO)'s TCR rose 3.4 from 0.8 in 2017 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Chesterfield, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #51/131
  • PHOTO Madern USA, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Madern USA, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO) averages 2.9 TCR (88% of the Die sets for metal stamping presses manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO) TCR series: 2017=0.8 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO) falls in its industry

387 Die sets for metal stamping pr establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 131 Die sets for metal stamping pr employers in Michigan.

Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO) (101 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO)
Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO) (101 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO) has more employees than the Die sets for metal stamping presses manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 2.1 2 2 0
2023 4.2 2.1 4 0 0
2022 6.3 5.0 5 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2020 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2019 1.9 1.2 3 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Chesterfield

387 Die sets for metal stamping presses manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 74 employers in Chesterfield, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Madern USA, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marion Die & Fixture 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ascent Aerospace - Lake Orion (ODY) 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ODC Tooling & Molds 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midland Cogeneration Venture 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Battle Creek SC 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM & Sons, Inc. 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2683_5121 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2692 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR Motor City Stamping, Inc. 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2692 349 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesterfield (Mt Clemens) MFG (EF, AUTO) 253 FTE
NAT-TCR Jftb Dfac 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Albuquerque,NM 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lewis & Tibbitts, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Clackamas 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hunter's Manufacturing Co. Inc. 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spokane 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring City Electrical Mfg. Co. 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE IES Sacramento 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.