Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · California

Jftb Dfac

Los Alamitos, CA · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jftb Dfac runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade C.

Jftb Dfac: 2.9 TCR = 97% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jftb Dfac safety composite

Jftb Dfac scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Jftb Dfac: 0.0 → 6.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.34× in 2024

Jftb Dfac's TCR rose 6.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 6.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Los Alamitos, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 97% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #186/586
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT DELTA SKY …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT DELTA SKY CLUB LGA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Jftb Dfac in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jftb Dfac averages 2.9 TCR (97% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jftb Dfac TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=8 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.8 · BLS 3.0

Where Jftb Dfac falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #186 safest of 586 Cafeteria food services contra employers in California.

Jftb Dfac (38 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Jftb Dfac
Jftb Dfac (38 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Jftb Dfac has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.8 6.8 0 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.6 8.6 1 0 0
2018 8.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · CA · Los Alamitos

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 40 employers in Los Alamitos, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT DELTA SKY CLUB LGA 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCR Atlanta 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Google Root 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR M9111 Fairview Park 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 152 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-169 1,155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arrowhead Products 780 FTE
CITY-NEAR Epson America 586 FTE
NAT-TCR Chesterfield Metals MFG (EF, AUTO) 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Albuquerque,NM 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Brookfield - Town Hall 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Clackamas 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ptcr Lithia Springs 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norton 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atsumi Car Equipment Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Progressive Foam Technologies Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.