Electric Power Distribution · Minnesota

Chestnut EMC

Minneapolis, MN · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chestnut EMC runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade D.

Chestnut EMC: 2.4 TCR = 196% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chestnut EMC safety composite

Chestnut EMC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Chestnut EMC held a steady TCR band

Chestnut EMC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.4 · 196% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/85
  • PHOTO GREENVILLE
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GREENVILLE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Chestnut EMC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chestnut EMC averages 2.4 TCR (196% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chestnut EMC TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Chestnut EMC falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 85 Electric Power Distribution employers in Minnesota.

Chestnut EMC (23 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chestnut EMC
Chestnut EMC (23 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Chestnut EMC has fewer employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2018 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MN · Minneapolis

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GREENVILLE 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pewaukee Central Stores 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PEC-Liberty Hill 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wichita Operations Center 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brooten 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Alpha Foods, LLP 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNHT-SEL-HIGHWAY 12' 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fergus Falls CSC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Roses 1895 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nissin Brake Georgia 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 40 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Golden Service Center 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brighton Service Center 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plainview Service Center 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAPA Auto Parts Altoona 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.