Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential · Massachusetts

Chestnut Hill Drive

Webster, MA · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chestnut Hill Drive runs at 544% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential workplace, earning a grade F.

Chestnut Hill Drive: 20.7 TCR = 544% of Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chestnut Hill Drive safety composite

Chestnut Hill Drive scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chestnut Hill Drive: 8.0 → 33.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 33.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.4× in 2019

Chestnut Hill Drive's TCR rose 25.4 from 8.0 in 2017 to 33.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Webster, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.7 · 544% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #69/74
  • PHOTO Chileda
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chileda (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Chestnut Hill Drive in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chestnut Hill Drive averages 20.7 TCR (544% of the Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chestnut Hill Drive TCR series: 2017=8 · 2019=33.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Chestnut Hill Drive falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 74 Intellectual and developmental employers in Massachusetts.

Chestnut Hill Drive (21 employees, TCR 20.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Chestnut Hill Drive
Chestnut Hill Drive (21 employees, TCR 20.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Chestnut Hill Drive has fewer employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 33.4 8.3 4 0 0
2017 8.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MA · Webster

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 46 employers in Webster, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chileda 20.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hav-It Services - North Group Home 20.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spaulding Youth Center 20.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ADAPT INCORPORATED 20.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bellingham Energy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Medway 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Medway Power Plant 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jeffco Fibres, Inc. 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR WEBSTER #240 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR 226_358 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Industrial Packaging 187 FTE
NAT-TCR Fire #1 211 So. 500 E. 20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0602 Westwood 20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Stonerise Bridgeport 20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 20.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 103078 - Seattle Marine Yard 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073-SW-20730210-CS 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Havertys Furniture-Daytona Beach 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.