Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415

Minnetonka, MN · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 runs at 544% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415: 20.7 TCR = 544% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 safety composite

Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 36.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415: 3.3 → 48.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 48.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.77× in 2020

Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415's TCR rose 45.5 from 3.3 in 2018 to 48.8 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Minnetonka, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.7 · 544% of ind

  • DART 36.6 DART
  • RANK #231/240
  • PHOTO Complete Care at Vic…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Complete Care at Victoria Commons, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 averages 20.7 TCR (544% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 TCR series: 2018=3.3 · 2019=10 · 2020=48.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #231 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 (35 employees, TCR 20.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415
Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 (35 employees, TCR 20.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 48.8 36.6 4 8 0
2019 10.0 10.0 3 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Minnetonka

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 179 employers in Minnetonka, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Complete Care at Victoria Commons, LLC 20.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonata Lake Mary 20.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Retreat at Buford 20.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Isle at Kingwood 20.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dollymount 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scotch Prairie Farms LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genex Farm Systems Melrose 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Dog Power Plant 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN008 1,873 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Marsh 1,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN006 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN006 MINNETONKA-9800 HEALTH CARE LN 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Springfield Shunk Office 20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa 20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Complete Care at Victoria Commons, LLC 20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ME022MEM 20.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wabash, in Branch 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard Dulles Town Center 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 058k - Orlando 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cameron Hall of Ellijay 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.