Refinery, petroleum, construction · California

Chevron Richmond Refinery

Richmond, CA · ~1,191 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chevron Richmond Refinery runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Refinery, petroleum, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Chevron Richmond Refinery: 0.3 TCR = 9% of Refinery, petroleum, construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chevron Richmond Refinery safety composite

Chevron Richmond Refinery scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Chevron Richmond Refinery held a steady TCR band

Chevron Richmond Refinery's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.2 in 2017 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Richmond, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #7/45
  • PHOTO T.R.S.C., Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~1,191 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: T.R.S.C., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Chevron Richmond Refinery in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chevron Richmond Refinery averages 0.3 TCR (9% of the Refinery, petroleum, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chevron Richmond Refinery TCR series: 2017=0.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Chevron Richmond Refinery falls in its industry

809 Refinery, petroleum, construct establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 45 Refinery, petroleum, construct employers in California.

Chevron Richmond Refinery (1,191 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Chevron Richmond Refinery
Chevron Richmond Refinery (1,191 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Chevron Richmond Refinery has more employees than the Refinery, petroleum, construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.3 5 0 0
2023 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2022 0.3 0.3 3 0 0
2021 0.5 0.3 7 0 0
2020 0.5 0.4 3 4 0
2019 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.2 0.1 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · CA · Richmond

809 Refinery, petroleum, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR T.R.S.C., Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palmetto Services, LLC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR C6313 - Enterprise Frac 14 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Excel Contractors @ OCI Nederland TX 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson 1,190 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2643-64030322-322001 1,192 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Hawk Casino 1,190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nutanix-San Jose CA 1,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR Hawk Installation and Construction 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Premier Equipment Corporation 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Montvale Research and Development 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SME Steel Corporate Office Utah 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clairton Plant 1,191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corp Office Carlisle PA 1,191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hino Motors Manufacturing Arkansas 1,191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stanley Electric U.S Co Inc 1,191 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.