VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE · Arizona

Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford

Chandler, AZ · ~216 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE workplace, earning a grade B.

Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford: 2.3 TCR = 66% of VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford safety composite

Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford injury rate improved

Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford's TCR fell 2.7 from 4.2 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=3.2 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Chandler, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 66% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #39/78
  • PHOTO Haddad Hyundai
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~216 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Haddad Hyundai (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford averages 2.3 TCR (66% of the VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=3.2 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.4

Where Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford falls in its industry

2,847 VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 78 VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE employers in Arizona.

Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford (216 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford
Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford (216 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Chford-Emcaz-F2 Chandler Ford has more employees than the VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 7 0 0
2020 2.4 1.9 5 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 4 0 0
2017 3.2 0.8 8 0 0
2016 4.2 0.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · AZ · Chandler

2,847 VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 462 employers in Chandler, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Haddad Hyundai 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gaylord 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CITY AUTO GROUP-TALLAHASSEE TWO, LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vaden Chevrolet Pooler 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE DSSA-AZ 216 FTE
STATE-SIZE 660-00622 216 FTE
STATE-SIZE Casa de la Luz Hospice 216 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chandler Campus 6,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocotillo Campus 5,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030510 3,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030510-510001 2,446 FTE
NAT-TCR Sterling Shipyard LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Dock Products - Atlanta 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Auer Steel & Heating Supply - WI 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DeGrandchamps Blueberry Farm 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 30804 - Capstone - 99 Cent Only Garfield CA 216 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bonnell Aluminum (Niles), LLC 216 FTE
NAT-SIZE Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - West Seneca 216 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thunder Bay Community Health Service, Inc MSWP 216 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.