Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · North Dakota

CHI Living Communities Riverview

Fargo, ND · ~61 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CHI Living Communities Riverview runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

CHI Living Communities Riverview: 3.2 TCR = 85% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CHI Living Communities Riverview safety composite

CHI Living Communities Riverview scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.8

2018→2021

CHI Living Communities Riverview injury rate improved

CHI Living Communities Riverview's TCR fell 12.8 from 12.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=12.8 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Fargo, ND AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/24
  • PHOTO Mayfair Village Reti…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mayfair Village Retirement Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

CHI Living Communities Riverview in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CHI Living Communities Riverview averages 3.2 TCR (85% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CHI Living Communities Riverview TCR series: 2018=12.8 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where CHI Living Communities Riverview falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 24 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Dakota.

CHI Living Communities Riverview (61 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CHI Living Communities Riverview
CHI Living Communities Riverview (61 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

CHI Living Communities Riverview has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.1 0.0 2 0 0
2018 12.8 2.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · ND · Fargo

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 415 employers in Fargo, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mayfair Village Retirement Center 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pheasant Ridge Senior Living 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Abbewood 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FSLF-KNUTE-FRANCISCAN SISTERS 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Summit ESP - Ross, ND 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE CENTRAL POWER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capital City Construction, Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dennys 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,963 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - North Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - Fargo Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Broadway Hospital-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,547 FTE
NAT-TCR Leviton Lighting 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 55870 Richmond 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint-Gobain Crystals- Newbury 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Building 3 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Novelis 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scentsy KY Temps 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Down To Earth Judkins 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.