Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing · Indiana

Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America

Franklin, IN · ~119 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America: 3.2 TCR = 60% of Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America safety composite

Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2021

Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America injury rate improved

Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America's TCR fell 0.5 from 4.2 in 2017 to 3.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.2 · 2019=1.8 · 2021=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336310 · Franklin, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.2 · 60% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #8/17
  • PHOTO Warren Industries, I…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Warren Industries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America averages 3.2 TCR (60% of the Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America TCR series: 2017=4.2 · 2019=1.8 · 2021=3.7 · BLS 5.4

Where Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America falls in its industry

221 Engines and parts (except dies establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 17 Engines and parts (except dies employers in Indiana.

Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America (119 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America
Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America (119 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Mitsubishi Turbocharger and Engine America has fewer employees than the Engines and parts (except diesel), autom median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.7 3.7 1 3 0
2019 1.8 0.9 1 1 0
2017 4.2 3.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336310 · IN · Franklin

221 Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 78 employers in Franklin, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Warren Industries, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NSI Crankshaft 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Soults Pump 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Romeo Engine 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Company Headquarters 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hydaker-Wheatlake - Indiana Statewide 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE James Babcock, Inc 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interactions Inc. dba Hoosier Refreshment Co. 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson Memorial Health 878 FTE
CITY-NEAR KAC Franklin 726 FTE
CITY-NEAR Government 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reman Powertrain Indiana 473 FTE
NAT-TCR Saint-Gobain Crystals- Newbury 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 55870 Richmond 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Leviton Lighting 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CHI Living Communities Riverview 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE MPP Los Angeles 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dartmouth Journal Services 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeshore Village Healthcare Center 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE NPS Holdings LLC Spirit Way 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.