Aerosol packaging services · Illinois

Chicago Aerosol

Coal City, IL · ~200 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Chicago Aerosol runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aerosol packaging services workplace, earning a grade B.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
30
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Chicago Aerosol's OSHA Total Case Rate of 2.4 to the Aerosol packaging services BLS benchmark of 3.3 (74% of benchmark) across 6 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Chicago Aerosol's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

01234 201720182019202020212022 2.13.3 Industry benchmarkChicago Aerosol TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 325998.

Where Chicago Aerosol falls in its industry

550 Aerosol packaging services establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 39 Aerosol packaging services employers in Illinois.

Trend analysis for Chicago Aerosol

Between 2017 and 2022, Chicago Aerosol's Total Case Rate worsened from 1.9 to 2.1 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 13% increase across 5 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 0.8, while 2020 saw the highest rate, at 3.7, a spread of 2.9 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 6 reporting years, Chicago Aerosol recorded 30 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 6-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 30 injuries, 3 illnesses shown on this page for Chicago Aerosol are sourced from its own 6 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 325998 - Aerosol packaging services.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2022)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

2 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 373,779 hours worked = 1.07 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Chicago Aerosol (this establishment) 2.44 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 6-year avg
Defoamers and antifoaming agents manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 325998
Illinois state avg (all industries) 4.73 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Chicago Aerosol to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.1 1.1 4 0 0
2021 3.3 1.8 7 2 0
2020 3.7 2.1 8 1 0
2019 2.8 0.9 6 0 0
2018 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2017 1.9 1.9 3 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Chicago Aerosol's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Aerosol packaging services peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 74% of the Aerosol packaging services benchmark, Chicago Aerosol reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Aerosol packaging services sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Chicago Aerosol's safety grade?
Chicago Aerosol has a safety grade of B (Good Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.4 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Aerosol packaging services.
How many injuries has Chicago Aerosol reported?
Chicago Aerosol has reported 30 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 6 years of OSHA data (2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Illinois, and by nearby establishments in Coal City - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~2.4)

Similar size (~200 workers)

Nearby in Coal City

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.