Rubber processing preparations (e.g., accelerators, stabilizers) manufacturing · Ohio

Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant

Cleveland, OH · ~75 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Rubber processing preparations (e.g., accelerators, stabilizers) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant: 2.5 TCR = 74% of Rubber processing preparations (e.g., accelerators, stabilizers) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant safety composite

Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant held a steady TCR band

Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.4 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Cleveland, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 74% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #24/45
  • PHOTO Farmers Branch
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Farmers Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant averages 2.5 TCR (74% of the Rubber processing preparations (e.g., accelerators, stabilizers) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant falls in its industry

485 Rubber processing preparations establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 45 Rubber processing preparations employers in Ohio.

Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant (75 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant
Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant (75 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Flow Polymers St. Clair Plant has more employees than the Rubber processing preparations (e.g., ac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.3 1.1 2 1 0
2018 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.4 2.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · OH · Cleveland

485 Rubber processing preparations (e.g., accelerators, stabilizers) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Farmers Branch 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carbon Activated Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago Aerosol 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cargill Industrial Specialties - Dalton, GA 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bardshar Wholesale 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newark Service Center 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Midwest (Columbus) 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirk Bros Co, Inc. 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR SMI 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 12 - Kansas City Front. Street Plant 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cass Construction, Inc. dba Cass Arrieta 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Perry Memorial Hospital 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mandon Building Systems, Inc 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chatham Oaks 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Copperhead Pipeline and Construction Inc 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE William Lyon Homes, Inc. - AZ Division 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.