Fabricated structural metal manufacturing · Illinois

Chicago Metal Rolled Products

Chicago, IL · ~65 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chicago Metal Rolled Products runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fabricated structural metal manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Chicago Metal Rolled Products: 5.3 TCR = 159% of Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chicago Metal Rolled Products safety composite

Chicago Metal Rolled Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2024

Chicago Metal Rolled Products injury rate improved

Chicago Metal Rolled Products's TCR fell 5.5 from 5.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=14.5 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 159% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/51
  • PHOTO Amthor Steel
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amthor Steel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Chicago Metal Rolled Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chicago Metal Rolled Products averages 5.3 TCR (159% of the Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chicago Metal Rolled Products TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=14.5 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Chicago Metal Rolled Products falls in its industry

1,491 Fabricated structural metal ma establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 51 Fabricated structural metal ma employers in Illinois.

Chicago Metal Rolled Products (65 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chicago Metal Rolled Products
Chicago Metal Rolled Products (65 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Chicago Metal Rolled Products has more employees than the Fabricated structural metal manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 14.5 12.9 9 0 0
2020 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2016 5.5 5.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · IL · Chicago

1,491 Fabricated structural metal manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amthor Steel 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Excel Stamping and Manufacturing, INC. - Stamping Operations 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canam Steel Corporation 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SteelFab of Virginia Inc 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience McLeansboro Production 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bluff City Materials - Corporate Office 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vector Services 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yorkville Reporting Center 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Twinsburg Health Care Center 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cross City Lumber 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vtrut - Rutland 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mihgt - Houghton Center 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Water Pollution Control Plant 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kight Component Plant 536 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carter Component Plant 542 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Noland Hospital Anniston 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.