Extended care hospitals (except mental, substance abuse) · Alabama

Noland Hospital Anniston

Anniston, AL · ~65 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Noland Hospital Anniston runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Extended care hospitals (except mental, substance abuse) workplace, earning a grade D.

Noland Hospital Anniston: 6.4 TCR = 169% of Extended care hospitals (except mental, substance abuse) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Noland Hospital Anniston safety composite

Noland Hospital Anniston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2018→2024

Noland Hospital Anniston injury rate improved

Noland Hospital Anniston's TCR fell 3.3 from 8.4 in 2018 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.4 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=10.0 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Anniston, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 169% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #13/28
  • PHOTO Select Specialty Hos…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Select Specialty Hospital - Tulsa/Midtown, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Noland Hospital Anniston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Noland Hospital Anniston averages 6.4 TCR (169% of the Extended care hospitals (except mental, substance abuse) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Noland Hospital Anniston TCR series: 2018=8.4 · 2019=8 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=10 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Noland Hospital Anniston falls in its industry

1,390 Extended care hospitals (excep establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 28 Extended care hospitals (excep employers in Alabama.

Noland Hospital Anniston (65 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Noland Hospital Anniston
Noland Hospital Anniston (65 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Noland Hospital Anniston has fewer employees than the Extended care hospitals (except mental, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2023 10.0 10.0 4 0 0
2022 4.5 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 6.6 2.2 3 0 0
2019 8.0 4.0 4 0 0
2018 8.4 8.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · AL · Anniston

1,390 Extended care hospitals (except mental, substance abuse) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 101 employers in Anniston, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Tulsa/Midtown, LLC 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR H4244 CORNERSTONE HOSP SE ARIZONA 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR H4840 KH DALLAS CENTRAL 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coosa Valley Electric Cooperative 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE North American Construction Services, LTD 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lambert Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Abramson 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Union 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Union Anniston 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Automotive Components 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Automotive Components Anniston 344 FTE
NAT-TCR Royal Green LLC 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KSB, Inc. Western Division 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DyCast Specialties Corp 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mesa Verde Enterprises 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Insteel Wire Products AZW 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coating and Converting Technologies 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dodson Service Center 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago Metal Rolled Products 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.