Air cargo containers, light gauge metal, manufacturing · Illinois

Chicago Steel Container LLC

Chicago, IL · ~64 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chicago Steel Container LLC runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Air cargo containers, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Chicago Steel Container LLC: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Air cargo containers, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chicago Steel Container LLC safety composite

Chicago Steel Container LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Chicago Steel Container LLC held a steady TCR band

Chicago Steel Container LLC's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.0 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.9 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332439 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #5/15
  • PHOTO MAUSER USA - PINE BL…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MAUSER USA - PINE BLUFF PLANT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Chicago Steel Container LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chicago Steel Container LLC averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Air cargo containers, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chicago Steel Container LLC TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.9 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Chicago Steel Container LLC falls in its industry

175 Air cargo containers, light ga establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 15 Air cargo containers, light ga employers in Illinois.

Chicago Steel Container LLC (64 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chicago Steel Container LLC
Chicago Steel Container LLC (64 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Chicago Steel Container LLC has more employees than the Air cargo containers, light gauge metal, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 1.4 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.2 1.4 3 0 0
2021 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.7 5.7 2 2 0
2018 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2016 4.0 4.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332439 · IL · Chicago

175 Air cargo containers, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MAUSER USA - PINE BLUFF PLANT 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Armor Metal 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Steel Container Corporation - Niles 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMC Plant 1 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Sod 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Sod Farms, Inc 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nashville 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alliance Contractors Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR U Pull and Pay Aurora 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Geon Performance Solutions Seabrook 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkway Health & Rehab LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR IMS Engineered Products - New Berlin 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE BelleFlex Technologies LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE S10278 - Kathleen Hauling 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE NWH, Marienville 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agrarian Inc 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.