Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Georgia

Chief Container Company, Inc.

Acworth, GA · ~167 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chief Container Company, Inc. runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Chief Container Company, Inc.: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chief Container Company, Inc. safety composite

Chief Container Company, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Chief Container Company, Inc. injury rate improved

Chief Container Company, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.0 from 3.1 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=6.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Acworth, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #38/63
  • PHOTO BURLINGTON, WI
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~167 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BURLINGTON, WI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Chief Container Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chief Container Company, Inc. averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chief Container Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=6 · 2020=0 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Chief Container Company, Inc. falls in its industry

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugate establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 63 Shipping containers, corrugate employers in Georgia.

Chief Container Company, Inc. (167 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Chief Container Company, Inc.
Chief Container Company, Inc. (167 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Chief Container Company, Inc. has more employees than the Shipping containers, corrugated, made fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 4 0 0
2019 6.0 2.2 11 0 0
2018 5.8 4.9 7 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 2 1 0
2016 3.1 1.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · GA · Acworth

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 73 employers in Acworth, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BURLINGTON, WI 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adapt-A-Pak 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Packaging Services of Maryland Inc Plant 2 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LITHONIA, GA (ATLANTA - 6479) 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Excel Electrical Technologies, Inc. 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherokee Carpet 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE UFP Moultrie - LLC 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 70/86 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inalfa Roof Systems - Cherokee Campus 698 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jacobs Telecommunications 441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chief Specialty Packaging 422 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3748 361 FTE
NAT-TCR Quality Welding and Fabrication LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Largo 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ACTIA Corp 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilbert 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Concordia at Rebecca Residence 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kyocera International Inc. 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kanzaki Specialty Papers 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kooima Company LLC 167 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.