Air-conditioning supply · Indiana

Chilled Water Division

Indianapolis, IN · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chilled Water Division runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Air-conditioning supply workplace, earning a grade D.

Chilled Water Division: 1.9 TCR = 163% of Air-conditioning supply BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chilled Water Division safety composite

Chilled Water Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chilled Water Division: 0.0 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Chilled Water Division's TCR rose 5.8 from 0.0 in 2018 to 5.8 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221330 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 163% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P61
  • PHOTO Centrio Energy
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Centrio Energy (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Chilled Water Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chilled Water Division averages 1.9 TCR (163% of the Air-conditioning supply BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chilled Water Division TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Chilled Water Division falls in its industry

44 Air-conditioning supply establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Chilled Water Division (22 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chilled Water Division
Chilled Water Division (22 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Chilled Water Division has fewer employees than the Air-conditioning supply median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.8 0.0 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221330 · IN · Indianapolis

44 Air-conditioning supply employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Centrio Energy 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Citizens Energy Group-Steam 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cooper River Partners, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRG Energy Center Pittsburgh 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilson Fertilizer, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MISHAWAKA CONCRETE ASPHALT RECYCLE INC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCAR 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connersville District Office 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR The Wright Group - Modesto 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wellsboro, PA Yard 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Baker Georgia 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Meister Logistics Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Power Bolt and Tool Inc 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Marion 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Binswanger Glass Branch 502 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.