Bridge construction · Pennsylvania

Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA

Easton, PA · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bridge construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA: 6.3 TCR = 226% of Bridge construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA safety composite

Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2016→2020

Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA injury rate improved

Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA's TCR fell 9.7 from 9.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=10.0 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=6.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Easton, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.3 · 226% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #158/196
  • PHOTO Phillips Hardy Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phillips Hardy Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA averages 6.3 TCR (226% of the Bridge construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=10 · 2018=6 · 2019=6 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA falls in its industry

4,078 Bridge construction establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #158 safest of 196 Bridge construction employers in Pennsylvania.

Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA (22 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA
Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA (22 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA has fewer employees than the Bridge construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.0 6.0 1 0 0
2018 6.0 6.0 1 0 0
2017 10.0 5.0 2 0 0
2016 9.7 4.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · PA · Easton

4,078 Bridge construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 182 employers in Easton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phillips Hardy Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AC Pavement Striping Co. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cape Romain / McLean A Joint Venture 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sellwood Bridge 811240 Slayden/Sundt JV 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dawson's Orchards 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kuhn Orchards, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Giorgi Mushroom Farm 3 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hope 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ABE4 1,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAFAYETTE COLLEGE 1,338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Victaulic - Forks 1,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Radial - Easton 2 1,181 FTE
NAT-TCR 11 Ceres 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Stock Yards / Birmingham 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Schayes, Inc dba New York Sash 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hanover 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kingston-Rhinecliff Bridge 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Marion 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caris Healthcare-Cookeville, Tn 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chilled Water Division 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.