Custodial services · Maryland

Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base

Andrews Afb, MD · ~69 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Custodial services workplace, earning a grade A.

Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base: 0.6 TCR = 13% of Custodial services BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base safety composite

Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2019→2023

Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base injury rate improved

Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Andrews Afb, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/52
  • PHOTO RenKe Building Maint…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RenKe Building Maintenance Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base averages 0.6 TCR (13% of the Custodial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base TCR series: 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base falls in its industry

4,064 Custodial services establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 52 Custodial services employers in Maryland.

Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base (69 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base
Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base (69 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Chimes District of Columbia, Andrews Airforce Base has more employees than the Custodial services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · MD · Andrews Afb

4,064 Custodial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 8 employers in Andrews Afb, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RenKe Building Maintenance Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR QSI Eagle Grove 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Commercial Cleaning, LLC - Cincinnati 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Orleans GSA Custodial 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE H. A. Wagner, L.L.C. 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group West Virginia, LLC 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry H. Lewis Contractors, LLC 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iacoboni Site Specialists 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR DI - Joint Base Andrews (VIPSAM) 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR Executive Rotary Wing US MD Andrews AFB MD969 335 FTE
CITY-NEAR DI - Joint Base Andrews (Executive Wing) 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR DI - Joint Base Andrews (Rotary Wing) 76 FTE
NAT-TCR Md Clinics - Minden 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Envirotrol Service Division 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Alston Construction Company, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Central States Enterprises, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE America's Thrift Store #22 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dutch Ovens, LLC 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vierra Dairy 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buckley Roofing Company, Inc 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.