Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities · California

Chinatown Child Development Center

San Francisco, CA · ~21 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chinatown Child Development Center runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Chinatown Child Development Center: 2.7 TCR = 72% of Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chinatown Child Development Center safety composite

Chinatown Child Development Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.1

2020→2024

Chinatown Child Development Center injury rate improved

Chinatown Child Development Center's TCR fell 9.1 from 9.1 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=9.1 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #52/177
  • PHOTO Crossroads
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crossroads (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Chinatown Child Development Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chinatown Child Development Center averages 2.7 TCR (72% of the Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chinatown Child Development Center TCR series: 2020=9.1 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Chinatown Child Development Center falls in its industry

1,165 Residential Mental Health and establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 177 Residential Mental Health and employers in California.

Chinatown Child Development Center (21 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Chinatown Child Development Center
Chinatown Child Development Center (21 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Chinatown Child Development Center has fewer employees than the Residential Mental Health and Substance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2020 9.1 4.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · CA · San Francisco

1,165 Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crossroads 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Union Fresh Start LLC dba Serenity at Summit New Jersey 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lehi Connects 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aperion Care Chicago Heights 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Garlinghouse Brothers, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LZL Construction, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 056-BELEN 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fond du Lac Express Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southpark Mall 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fenton 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeastern Minnesota Multi-County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silvi Concrete of Brick 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.