Conservation and reclamation agencies · California

Chino Basin Water Conservation District

Name: Chino Basin Water Conservation District Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Montclair, CA · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.4
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chino Basin Water Conservation District runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Conservation and reclamation agencies workplace, earning a grade C.

Chino Basin Water Conservation District: 3.4 TCR = 108% of Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chino Basin Water Conservation District safety composite

Chino Basin Water Conservation District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 3.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.9

2019→2021

Chino Basin Water Conservation District injury rate improved

Chino Basin Water Conservation District's TCR fell 6.9 from 6.9 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Montclair, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 108% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #23/96
PHOTO Pecan RC
BOOK 2y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pecan RC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Streamwood Par

3.5
Baldwin Hills

3.5
This site

3.4
Pecan RC

3.4
EI054 - Aitkin

3.4

What this shows Chino Basin Water Conservation District averages 3.4 TCR (108% of the Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS benchmark).

Chino Basin Water Conservation District TCR series: 2019=6.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Chino Basin Water Conservation District falls in its industry

413 Conservation and reclamation a establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 96 Conservation and reclamation a employers in California.

Chino Basin Water Conservation District (20 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Chino Basin Water Conservation District has fewer employees than the Conservation and reclamation agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2021	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2019	6.9	6.9	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · CA · Montclair

413 Conservation and reclamation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 41 employers in Montclair, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Pecan RC	LOS ANGELES, CA	3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Streamwood Park District	STREAMWOOD, IL	3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	EI054 - Aitkin Office	AITKIN, MN	3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Baldwin Hills RC	LOS ANGELES, CA	3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Sills Farms, Inc.	PLEASANT GROVE	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC	BRENTWOOD	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CALMEX CONTRACTING INC	PORTERVILLE	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Velvet Antler Ranch LLC	LINDEN	20 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Hampton Tedder Electric	Montclair	429 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Montclair Hospital Medical Hospital	Montclair	388 FTE
CITY-NEAR	0686 - MONTCLAIR CA WHSE	Montclair	300 FTE
CITY-NEAR	St. George Auto Sales, INC	Montclair	300 FTE
NAT-TCR	Jarrell	Earth City, MO	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Cadence Inc. Virginia	Staunton, VA	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Eagle Transport Corporation - Charlotte	Charlotte, NC	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	buybuy Baby Aurora	Aurora, CO	3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Dunwoody Village	Atlanta, GA	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Mead Lumber Beatrice	Beatrice, NE	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Kelly Electrical Services, Inc.	Wheat Ridge, CO	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Resource Recovery	Ames, IA	20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.