Industry profile · NAICS 924120

Fish and game agencies

Workplace injury rates across 377 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

377
Employers
6.3
Avg TCR
3.2
BLS benchmark
7,486
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Fish and game agencies average 6.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.0 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.2.

6.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.2
BLS national benchmark
377
employers reporting
7,486
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Fish and game agencies Safety Data Reveals

The Fish and game agencies sector (NAICS 924120) encompasses 377 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 7,486 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 6.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Fish and game agencies that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 11
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Mt. Carmel RC Los Angeles, CA F 29.7
Park Services West Dundee, IL F 27.8
John C. Argue Swim Stadium Los Angeles, CA F 26.3
Algin Sutton RC Los Angeles, CA F 24.9
City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road Hamden, CT F 24.1
Parks & Recreation Fairfield, CA F 23.9
Green Meadows RC Los Angeles, CA F 21.9
San Joaquin County Department of Parks and Recreation Stockton, CA F 21.7
Town of Wolcott Wolcott, CT F 21.5
Ross Snyder RC Los Angeles, CA F 21.4
CSY (Class parks &SNL) Los Angeles, CA F 20.4
Parks and Recreation Branford, CT F 18.5
Branford RC Arleta, CA F 18.5
Conservation Cedar Falls, IA F 18.5
Rock Island County Forest Preserve Illinois City, IL F 18.3
Echo Park Pool Los Angeles, CA F 17.9
DPW Parks Division Merced, CA F 17.8
City of Charlottesville-Parks Charlottesville, VA F 17.3
Kankakee Valley Park District Kankakee, IL F 16.8
Benton County Natural Areas, Parks, and Events Corvallis, OR F 16.6
District 3 - Makakilo Community Park Kapolei, HI F 16.3
Conservation Corps St Paul, MN F 16.2
Village of South Elgin - Municipal Annex South Elgin, IL F 16.1
City of Burbank - Parks and Recreation - Aquatics/McCambridge Burbank, CA F 16.1
Stoner RC Los Angeles, CA F 15.8
Guilford Parks and Recreation Department Guilford, CT F 15.7
MOA Parks & Recreation North Park Maintenance Anchorage, AK F 15.6
Martin Luther King RC Los Angeles, CA F 15.2
City Wide Aquatics Offices Los Angeles, CA F 15.2
City Of Meriden Parks & Rec Meiden, CT F 15.0
MOA Parks & Recreation South Park Maintenance Anchorage, AK F 14.4
Balboa Lake Aquatics Van Nuys, CA F 14.3
Shelton Community Center Shelton, CT F 14.2
Black Hawk County Conservation Waterloo, IA F 14.1
San Francisco Recreation and Park Department San Francisco, CA F 14.0
City of Phoenix 096 PR Aquatics Phoenix, AZ F 13.7
Parks & Recreation Aquatics Wailuku, HI F 13.6
Recreation and Park District Bakersfield, CA F 13.5
DEP014 - BNR-Wild-Sessions Wld Mgt Area Burlington, CT F 13.5
EI041 - Lake Verm/ Soudan Underground Mine State Park Soudan, MN F 13.4
Valley Region Construction Van Nuys, CA F 13.3
Departamento De Obras Publicas Fajardo, PR F 13.1
City of Goldsboro/Stormwater Goldsboro, NC F 13.1
Glencoe Park District Glencoe, IL F 13.0
Chevy Chase RC Los Angeles, CA F 12.8
Fresno PARCS Fresno, CA F 12.8
Conservation Corps MN & IA Saint Paul, MN F 12.6
Highlands Recreation District San Mateo, CA F 12.4
City of Goldsboro/ Maintenance Division Goldsboro, NC F 12.4
Parks, Recreation and Maintenance Shelby Township, MI F 12.0
Page 1 of 11 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Fish and game agencies?

This sector averages 6.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.