Employer · California

Chino, CA (CCG)

Chino, CA · ~49 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chino, CA (CCG) runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.

Chino, CA (CCG): 4.4 TCR = 200% of industry BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chino, CA (CCG) safety composite

Chino, CA (CCG) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2021→2023

Chino, CA (CCG) injury rate improved

Chino, CA (CCG)'s TCR fell 7.5 from 7.5 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7.5 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Chino, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 200% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #56/71
  • PHOTO NCD
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NCD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Chino, CA (CCG) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chino, CA (CCG) averages 4.4 TCR (200% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chino, CA (CCG) TCR series: 2021=7.5 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Chino, CA (CCG) falls in its industry

766 industry establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 71 industry employers in California.

Chino, CA (CCG) (49 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chino, CA (CCG)
Chino, CA (CCG) (49 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Chino, CA (CCG) has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.7 5.7 3 0 0
2021 7.5 5.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · CA · Chino

766 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NCD 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canton 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bettendorf Branch 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dallas, TX (CCG/IES) 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE LAJES FARMS INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunview Shandon 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rawah-Napa County 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Farms 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Institution for Men 1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR Autoform Tool & Manufacturing, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-Mack Plastics mfg. corp. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Electronic Controls Co. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid Island Steel Corp 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE AC & R Specialists 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hall Contracting Corporation 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Specialty Manufacturing of Menomonie 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE 012-MOTIE Bunker 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.