Skilled nursing facilities · California

Chino Valley Healthcare Center

Pomona, CA · ~161 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chino Valley Healthcare Center runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Chino Valley Healthcare Center: 6.5 TCR = 100% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chino Valley Healthcare Center safety composite

Chino Valley Healthcare Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Chino Valley Healthcare Center held a steady TCR band

Chino Valley Healthcare Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 84.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=22.0 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=84.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pomona, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.5 · 100% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #263/739
  • PHOTO Essex Pavilion
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Essex Pavilion (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Chino Valley Healthcare Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chino Valley Healthcare Center averages 6.5 TCR (100% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chino Valley Healthcare Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=22 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=84.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Chino Valley Healthcare Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #263 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

Chino Valley Healthcare Center (161 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chino Valley Healthcare Center
Chino Valley Healthcare Center (161 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Chino Valley Healthcare Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 84.4 84.4 4 1 0
2021 5.3 3.2 5 0 0
2020 22.0 20.9 5 16 1
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 11.5 9.2 10 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Pomona

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 177 employers in Pomona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Essex Pavilion 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sandgate Gardens 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chimney Rock Villa 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schnepp Senior Care & Rehab Center 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE La Valle Sabbia, Inc. 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Espinal FLC 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Avocado Corporation 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-SONGS Station 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center 3,804 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 524 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkels & McCoy, Inc. - Pomona, CA 1,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Niles Police Department 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1 - Rolfs 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Action Group, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TJ Samson Community Hospital 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat (Huntsville AL) 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forum at Lincoln Heights 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland-Halsey #015 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kennewick #002 161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.