Sanitary sewer construction · Pennsylvania

Chivers Construction Co., Inc.

Fairview, PA · ~52 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chivers Construction Co., Inc. runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sanitary sewer construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Chivers Construction Co., Inc.: 4.8 TCR = 170% of Sanitary sewer construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chivers Construction Co., Inc. safety composite

Chivers Construction Co., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chivers Construction Co., Inc.: 7.3 → 12.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.81× in 2024

Chivers Construction Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 5.7 from 7.3 in 2016 to 12.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Fairview, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 170% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #42/54
  • PHOTO Haren Construction C…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Haren Construction Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Chivers Construction Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chivers Construction Co., Inc. averages 4.8 TCR (170% of the Sanitary sewer construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chivers Construction Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=12.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Chivers Construction Co., Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Sanitary sewer construction establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 54 Sanitary sewer construction employers in Pennsylvania.

Chivers Construction Co., Inc. (52 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chivers Construction Co., Inc.
Chivers Construction Co., Inc. (52 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Chivers Construction Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Sanitary sewer construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.9 8.6 6 0 0
2023 6.8 1.7 2 2 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2017 6.1 3.1 3 1 0
2016 7.3 3.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · PA · Fairview

1,614 Sanitary sewer construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 36 employers in Fairview, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Haren Construction Co., Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minger Construction Co., Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitchell Engineering 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR W.C. Spratt, Inc. 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maitri Genetics 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Insa Shamokin Dam 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ethos Fairless Hills 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parker White Metal Co. 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHB Machining & Molding 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRIMM INDUSTRIES 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR API Technologies - Fairview Manufacturing 172 FTE
NAT-TCR St. Anne's Nursing Center and Residence 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rocky Mountain Twist Corp 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Flory Industries 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Aero-Tech Engineering 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Ramsey - Fire Department 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bass Air Conditioning Company,Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling Sintered Technologies 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westborough,MA - 270 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.