Distribution of electric power · Florida

Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative

Defuniak Springs, FL · ~160 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative: 3.1 TCR = 263% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative safety composite

Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative: 1.1 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2024

Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative's TCR rose 0.6 from 1.1 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Defuniak Springs, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.1 · 263% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #115/135
  • PHOTO Natchez Trace Electr…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Natchez Trace Electric Power Association (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative averages 3.1 TCR (263% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=4.3 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=3 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 1.2

Where Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #115 safest of 135 Distribution of electric power employers in Florida.

Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative (160 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative
Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative (160 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.1 1 2 0
2023 3.0 3.0 5 0 0
2022 1.8 0.6 3 0 0
2020 4.3 3.1 5 2 0
2019 6.7 2.7 10 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 5.3 3.7 10 0 0
2016 1.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · FL · Defuniak Springs

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 23 employers in Defuniak Springs, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Natchez Trace Electric Power Association 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Fulton Operating 116675 Wills Road 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Port Arthur Service Center 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Entergy Magnolia 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilco Electrical llc 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Morrison Sarasota Division 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE US082: Tampa 292 - SG 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE WPN-Well 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1134 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZPEN 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR LP Defuniak Springs, LLC-- Chautauqua 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chautauqua Springs Health Center 138 FTE
NAT-TCR Coverlay Manufacturing Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Playworld - Lewisburg 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlas Jonesboro 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cleveland Steel Container Corporation - Niles 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Transitions Healthcare Washington PA LLC 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Mechanical Inc. 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora Flight Sciences of WV 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oil City Tube Division 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.