Distribution of electric power · Texas

Port Arthur Service Center

Port Arthur, TX · ~20 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Port Arthur Service Center runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Port Arthur Service Center: 3.1 TCR = 263% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Port Arthur Service Center safety composite

Port Arthur Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2022

Port Arthur Service Center injury rate improved

Port Arthur Service Center's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Port Arthur, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.1 · 263% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #192/246
  • PHOTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE ELECT…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CHOCTAWHATCHEE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Port Arthur Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Port Arthur Service Center averages 3.1 TCR (263% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Port Arthur Service Center TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=5 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Port Arthur Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #192 safest of 246 Distribution of electric power employers in Texas.

Port Arthur Service Center (20 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Port Arthur Service Center
Port Arthur Service Center (20 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Port Arthur Service Center has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2017 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 4.3 4.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · TX · Port Arthur

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 122 employers in Port Arthur, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CHOCTAWHATCHEE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Natchez Trace Electric Power Association 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Fulton Operating 116675 Wills Road 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Entergy Magnolia 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms TXP 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CANNONADE SOD FARM 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Cooperative Society #1 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Slaton Coop Gin 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Motiva Enterprises LLC 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR Port Arthur Liquefaction Project 1,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR Echo Maintenance LLC 937 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Premcor Refining Group INC 773 FTE
NAT-TCR Bumble Bee Seafoods - Santa Fe Springs 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dusobox 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 4028-ARW01 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Detroit Lucas Dr 295 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sonesta ES Suites San Diego - Sorrento Mesa 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bed Bath and Beyond Bangor 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bed Bath and Beyond Altoona 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roses 520 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.