Homes for the aged with nursing care · Michigan

Christian Care Assisted Living

Muskegon, MI · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Christian Care Assisted Living runs at 276% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Christian Care Assisted Living: 17.9 TCR = 276% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Christian Care Assisted Living safety composite

Christian Care Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−49.3

2017→2023

Christian Care Assisted Living injury rate improved

Christian Care Assisted Living's TCR fell 49.3 from 49.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 49.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=49.3 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Muskegon, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.9 · 276% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #439/471
  • PHOTO DGS Healthcare Elkin…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DGS Healthcare Elkin, Inc DBA Hugh Chatham Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Christian Care Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Christian Care Assisted Living averages 17.9 TCR (276% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Christian Care Assisted Living TCR series: 2017=49.3 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Christian Care Assisted Living falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #439 safest of 471 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in Michigan.

Christian Care Assisted Living (66 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Christian Care Assisted Living
Christian Care Assisted Living (66 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Christian Care Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2017 49.3 11.6 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Muskegon

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 230 employers in Muskegon, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DGS Healthcare Elkin, Inc DBA Hugh Chatham Nursing Center 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-B02 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carolina Inn 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wadley SNF, LLC 17.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frank Rewold and Son, Inc. - Main Branch 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ox Paperboard WP, LLC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milbocker & Sons Inc 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE FSM Rochester Hills 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners - Sherman Campus 3,461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners-1500 E Sherman BLVD-MH-MI 2,598 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners - Hackley 1,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Arena 861 FTE
NAT-TCR DGS Healthcare Elkin, Inc DBA Hugh Chatham Nursing Center 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR East Vancouver Ready Mix 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Philadelphia 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Against the Grain Gourmet LLC 17.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bender Electronics, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abilities Services, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gotta Go Inc 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midstate Construction Corporaton 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.