Continuing care retirement communities · Florida

Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc.

Fort Myers, FL · ~1,014 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade C.

Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc.: 3.7 TCR = 98% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. safety composite

Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2021→2023

Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. injury rate improved

Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc.'s TCR fell 0.7 from 4.0 in 2021 to 3.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.0 · 2023=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Fort Myers, FL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 98% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #38/283
  • PHOTO FLOYD PLACE
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~1,014 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FLOYD PLACE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. averages 3.7 TCR (98% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. TCR series: 2021=4 · 2023=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 283 Continuing care retirement com employers in Florida.

Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. (1,014 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc.
Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. (1,014 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.4 2.4 34 2 0
2021 4.0 2.9 38 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Fort Myers

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 484 employers in Fort Myers, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FLOYD PLACE 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bloomingdale Memory Care, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-512145 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-542442 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Piper Aircraft 1,017 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 6099 1,018 FTE
STATE-SIZE NBC Sports Group : Golf Channel Drive - Orlando, FL 1,019 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Hospital Flagler 1,020 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCI-DANIELS LLC 2,935 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Health Ft Myers 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shell Point Retirement Communty 1,071 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crowther Roofing & Sheet Metal of Florida, Inc. 895 FTE
NAT-TCR VSM Gourment Garage of West 66th Street 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lourdes Care-Cherry Hill 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Lakes Cincinnati Dayton Rd 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 10304 Tulsa (WO) 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Weeks Marine - Dredging 1,014 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paradise Valley Hospital 1,014 FTE
NAT-SIZE STLSMO01 - AT&T Services, Inc. 1,014 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modesto Plant 1,014 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.