Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft · Florida

Piper Aircraft

Vero Beach, FL · ~1,017 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Piper Aircraft runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft workplace, earning a grade C.

Piper Aircraft: 3.5 TCR = 108% of Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Piper Aircraft safety composite

Piper Aircraft scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

Piper Aircraft injury rate improved

Piper Aircraft's TCR fell 1.1 from 3.3 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=3.5 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Vero Beach, FL ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 108% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #18/24
  • PHOTO SC007
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 253 inj
  • SIZE ~1,017 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SC007 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Piper Aircraft in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Piper Aircraft averages 3.5 TCR (108% of the Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Piper Aircraft TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=3.5 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Piper Aircraft falls in its industry

390 Developing and producing proto establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 24 Developing and producing proto employers in Florida.

Piper Aircraft (1,017 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Piper Aircraft
Piper Aircraft (1,017 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Piper Aircraft has more employees than the Developing and producing prototypes for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 1.3 27 2 0
2023 4.9 3.5 54 5 0
2022 4.8 4.3 46 2 0
2021 2.8 2.7 22 4 0
2020 2.3 1.8 20 2 0
2018 3.5 2.4 32 1 0
2017 4.7 3.5 33 3 0
2016 3.3 1.8 19 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · FL · Vero Beach

390 Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 148 employers in Vero Beach, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SC007 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Piedmont Aviation Component Services 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boeing Encore Interiors - Seal Beach 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Aeronautical Corporation 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 6099 1,018 FTE
STATE-SIZE NBC Sports Group : Golf Channel Drive - Orlando, FL 1,019 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Hospital Flagler 1,020 FTE
STATE-SIZE Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. 1,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR CC INDIAN RIVER 2,452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Indian River Hospital 2,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indian River Memorial Hospital Inc 2,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oslo 570 FTE
NAT-TCR E.H. Teasley Co.,Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Unilock, Ohio 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Delta Faucet Company 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Park Highlands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jamul Casino 1,017 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX_Irving_3301 W. Royal Lane_CCDAL014 1,017 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - FTW5 1,017 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harrah's Philadelphia Casino Racetrack 1,017 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.