General medical and surgical hospitals · Texas

CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights

San Antonio, TX · ~152 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade B.

CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights: 4.9 TCR = 65% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights safety composite

CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2018→2024

CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights injury rate improved

CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.9 in 2018 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.9 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=15.3 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.9 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #282/520
  • PHOTO JEFFERSON HOSPITAL
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JEFFERSON HOSPITAL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights averages 4.9 TCR (65% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights TCR series: 2018=2.9 · 2019=2 · 2020=15.3 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 7.5

Where CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #282 safest of 520 General medical and surgical h employers in Texas.

CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights (152 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights
CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights (152 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.0 7 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 4 0 0
2022 6.1 3.5 7 0 0
2021 7.7 2.6 8 1 0
2020 15.3 6.7 16 0 0
2019 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2018 2.9 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · TX · San Antonio

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JEFFERSON HOSPITAL 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LDS Hospital 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center-160 Robbins St-THONE-CT 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Burk Royalty Co. LTD 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bosque Disposal Systems LLC 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chase Center 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Civil Mechanical Clute 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR CHALK - Holiday Inn Express - Downtown 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Treyburn Rehabilitation Center 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Windy Ridge 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 30246 - CAPSTONE Shamrock Phoenix AZ 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brockton 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverfront YMCA 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Autumn Care of Drexel 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franklin 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.