Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plates, rods, shapes, sheets) merchant wholesalers · Massachusetts

Franklin

Franklin, MA · ~152 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Franklin runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plates, rods, shapes, sheets) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Franklin: 0.9 TCR = 42% of Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plates, rods, shapes, sheets) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Franklin safety composite

Franklin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Franklin: 0.0 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2024

Franklin's TCR rose 1.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423510 · Franklin, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 42% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #2/15
  • PHOTO CTI Distribution
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CTI Distribution (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Franklin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Franklin averages 0.9 TCR (42% of the Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plates, rods, shapes, sheets) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Franklin TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Franklin falls in its industry

1,299 Metal products (e.g., bars, in establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 15 Metal products (e.g., bars, in employers in Massachusetts.

Franklin (152 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Franklin
Franklin (152 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Franklin has more employees than the Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2022 0.7 0.3 2 0 0
2021 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 3 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 3.0 0.0 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423510 · MA · Franklin

1,299 Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plates, rods, shapes, sheets) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 85 employers in Franklin, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CTI Distribution 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Location #1 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metals USA Mobile Alabama 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR VSMPO-Tirus, US 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Barletta Contracting Services 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyde Park 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirkwood Printing Company LLC 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Global, Easthampton MA 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Taunton 1,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin 55 675 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin 50 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horace Mann Educational Associates 633 FTE
NAT-TCR 3498 - BELFOR Franchise Group MI 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Contravest Builders 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR York, PA - Cross Farm Lane 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 30160 Bek Fort Worth 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Autumn Care of Drexel 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Longview Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cityview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Alamo Heights 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.