Employer · Texas

CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings

Tyler, TX · ~75 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings: 1.3 TCR = 28% of industry BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings safety composite

CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2018→2020

CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings injury rate improved

CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.9 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Tyler, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #72/417
  • PHOTO MEM HERMANN INSTITUT…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MEM HERMANN INSTITUTE FOR REHA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings averages 1.3 TCR (28% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings TCR series: 2018=1.9 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings falls in its industry

4,064 industry establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 417 industry employers in Texas.

CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings (75 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings
CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings (75 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 1.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TX · Tyler

4,064 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 357 employers in Tyler, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MEM HERMANN INSTITUTE FOR REHA 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlson Building Maintenance, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bon Secours Clermont Hospital - EVS 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LineUp Services Corp. 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crownover Farms dba Lone Star Family Farms 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village farms Marfa 1 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rice, TX 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE CACTUS OPERATING 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler - CTMF 380 3,897 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Main Hospital 2,205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Tyler,TX-USA 2,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trinity Clinic - CTMF 381 1,705 FTE
NAT-TCR Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - East Plant) 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Roses 546 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Landsberg Chicago 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Houff Transfer, Inc. Weyers Cave 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dawson Health and Rehab 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE True Value Denver RDC 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insul-Con Inc 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE NDS 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.