Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Kentucky

Dawson Health and Rehab

Dawson Springs, KY · ~75 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dawson Health and Rehab runs at 278% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade F.

Dawson Health and Rehab: 18.1 TCR = 278% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dawson Health and Rehab safety composite

Dawson Health and Rehab scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 29.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dawson Health and Rehab: 18.3 → 29.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 29.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.65× in 2020

Dawson Health and Rehab's TCR rose 11.6 from 18.3 in 2018 to 29.9 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Dawson Springs, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.1 · 278% of ind

  • DART 29.9 DART
  • RANK #321/340
  • PHOTO Lake Emory Post Acut…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lake Emory Post Acute Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Dawson Health and Rehab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dawson Health and Rehab averages 18.1 TCR (278% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dawson Health and Rehab TCR series: 2018=18.3 · 2019=6 · 2020=29.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Dawson Health and Rehab falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #321 safest of 340 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Kentucky.

Dawson Health and Rehab (75 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dawson Health and Rehab
Dawson Health and Rehab (75 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Dawson Health and Rehab has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 29.9 29.9 3 12 0
2019 6.0 4.0 3 0 0
2018 18.3 3.7 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · KY · Dawson Springs

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 9 employers in Dawson Springs, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lake Emory Post Acute Care 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transitions Healthcare, LLC Chambersburg 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palo Alto Sub-Acute and Rehabilitation Center 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arc at Normal 18.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Danny's Construction Company LLC- Kansas 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Mechanical Construction, Inc - Lexington 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brown Spirnkler Corpration (Louisville, KY) 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE OVC Engineered Solutions 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR OUTWOOD 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7000-16070 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tradewater Health and Rehab 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tradewater Health and Rehabilitation 66 FTE
NAT-TCR Harlingen (Txhar) 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ANC Trucking LLC 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR California Water Service Group 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairmount - Special Programs 18.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Professional Buildings 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE True Value Denver RDC 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE NDS 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concrete Construction 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.