Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing · Illinois

Chronos Imaging

Aurora, IL · ~82 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chronos Imaging runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Chronos Imaging: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chronos Imaging safety composite

Chronos Imaging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chronos Imaging: 1.8 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.87× in 2023

Chronos Imaging's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.8 in 2018 to 2.3 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334517 · Aurora, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Carestream 1049
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carestream 1049 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Chronos Imaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chronos Imaging averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chronos Imaging TCR series: 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Chronos Imaging falls in its industry

60 Irradiation apparatus and tube establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Irradiation apparatus and tube employers in Illinois.

Chronos Imaging (82 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Chronos Imaging
Chronos Imaging (82 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Chronos Imaging has fewer employees than the Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., i median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 2.3 1 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334517 · IL · Aurora

60 Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 325 employers in Aurora, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carestream 1049 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Varex Imaging, Las Vegas 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elekta Inc. Atlanta 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE HOME NURSERY 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Plant 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Distribution 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indian Prairie School District 204 3,309 FTE
CITY-NEAR Factor Aurora 2,167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rush Copley Medical Center, Inc. 2,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR ANDY FRAIN SERVICES INC 2,100 FTE
NAT-TCR Service Steel Aerospace-Pico Rivera CA 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Ultra-met Company 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5174 Seekonk, MA 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BT Ankeny 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE PF TNC SNF Ops, LLC 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sarasota NJ TE LLC 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Veritiv Operating Company - PA160 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ufp Jefferson Ga 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.