Therapeutic X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g., medical, industrial, research) manufacturing · Utah

Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City

Salt Lake City, UT · ~1,017 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Therapeutic X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g., medical, industrial, research) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City: 1.2 TCR = 38% of Therapeutic X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g., medical, industrial, research) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City safety composite

Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2024

Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City injury rate improved

Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.4 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.4 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334517 · Salt Lake City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK P45
  • PHOTO Varex Imaging, Las V…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 84 inj
  • SIZE ~1,017 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Varex Imaging, Las Vegas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City averages 1.2 TCR (38% of the Therapeutic X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g., medical, industrial, research) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City TCR series: 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City falls in its industry

60 Therapeutic X-ray apparatus an establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City (1,017 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City
Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City (1,017 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City has more employees than the Therapeutic X-ray apparatus and tubes (e median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.5 9 0 1
2023 0.7 0.4 7 0 0
2022 1.1 0.8 10 2 0
2021 1.6 1.2 10 5 0
2020 1.3 0.9 12 1 0
2019 1.5 0.6 13 1 0
2018 1.3 0.4 12 0 0
2017 1.4 0.6 11 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334517 · UT · Salt Lake City

60 Therapeutic X-ray apparatus and tubes (e.g., medical, industrial, research) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Varex Imaging, Las Vegas 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elekta Inc. Atlanta 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carestream 1049 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chronos Imaging 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ogden Regional Medical Center 1,013 FTE
STATE-SIZE Associated Foods Farr West Warehouse 1,023 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGSP-UT03 1,044 FTE
STATE-SIZE Autoliv ASP, Inc. 1,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Varex Imaging, Las Vegas 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunrise to Sunset Food Service, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wooden Mallet Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Transport Service 60023 Magnolia 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saginaw 1,017 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Boldt Company 1,017 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - FTW5 1,017 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX_Irving_3301 W. Royal Lane_CCDAL014 1,017 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.