Janitorial services · Michigan

Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC)

Auburn Hills, MI · ~152 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC) runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Janitorial services workplace, earning a grade A.

Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC): 0.7 TCR = 16% of Janitorial services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC) safety composite

Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC): 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2019

Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC)'s TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #5/114
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT CHEVRON SA…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT CHEVRON SAN RAMON JANITORIAL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC) averages 0.7 TCR (16% of the Janitorial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC) falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial services establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 114 Janitorial services employers in Michigan.

Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC) (152 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC)
Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC) (152 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Chrysler Headquarters and Technical Center (CTC) has more employees than the Janitorial services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · MI · Auburn Hills

4,064 Janitorial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT CHEVRON SAN RAMON JANITORIAL 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fisher Window Cleaning, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT DELTA SKY CLUB LGA AC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Network Facility Management 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grand River Construction 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jergens Piping Corp-Mi 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warren Michigan Plant 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE PotlatchDeltic Land & Lumber, LLC. 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR Cediprof 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Vital Nutrients 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gates Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Santa Rosa Health & Rehabilitation 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dutchmen Plant 840 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE NEC Energy Solutions, Inc. 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABC Disposal Service, Inc. New Bedford Division 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.